Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
Trial News
United States Published In The Federal Register A Revised Proposed Final Judgment
As required under the Tunney Act, on November 28, 2001, the United States published in the Federal Register a Revised Proposed Final Judgment, a Competitive Impact Statement, and detailed procedures for the submission of public comments regarding the United States' proposed settlement with Microsoft. The 60-day public comment period lasted from November 28, 2001 through January 28, 2002. During that period, the United States received 32,392 comments from the public. Of these comments, the United States categorized 47 of these comments as "major." The United States provided the "major" comments to the Court on February 14, 2002, and subsequently published these comments on the Antitrust Division website.
On March 1, 2002, the United States made the full text of the public comments available for downloading and viewing on the Antitrust Division's website by implementing the procedure detailed in the United States' Motion for Leave of Court to Adopt an Alternative Procedure for Comment Publication . On May 3, 2002, the full text of the public comments was also published in the Federal Register.
Since November 21, 2004, the United States has received inquiries from six citizens requesting that some portion of the comments that they had submitted during the Tunney Act comment period be removed from the Antitrust Division's website. Generally, these citizens have requested that their personal information be removed from the Internet due to privacy concerns. None of these requests were related to the "major" comments.
Given that citizens have started to request removal of their comments and that the full text of the public comments will continue to be available to the public through the Federal Register and upon request from the United States, the United States believes it would be appropriate to remove these non-major comments from the Antitrust Division's website. The comments will still be widely available to the public and this will permit the United States to respond to what appear to be reasonable privacy concerns.
Therefore, subject to the Court's concurrence, the United States plans to remove all of the public comments not categorized as "major" from the Antitrust Division's website.
Definition:
Physical evidence introduced at a hearing or trial.
Grand Jury
Definition:
A group of citizens who decide whether the prosecutor has enough evidence to pursue felony (and perhaps also misdemeanor) charges against a person.
Hearing
Definition:
A court proceeding where testimony is given, exhibits are reviewed, and/or legal arguments are made to help a judge decide an issue in a case.
If you live in the following cities and need an Trial-Lawyer attorney you should contact
our Trial-Lawyer Attorney as soon as possible:
Apache Junction
Avondale
Buckeye
Bullhead City
Casa Grande
Cave Creek
Chandler
Chino Valley
Cottonwood
Douglas
Flagstaff
Florence
Fountain Hills
Gilbert
Glendale
Green Valley
Kingman
Lake Havasu City
Mesa
Nogales
Paradise Valley
Payson
Peoria
Phoenix
Prescott Valley
Safford
Scottsdale
Sierra Vista
Somerton
Sun City
Sun City West
Surprise
Tempe
Tucson
Yuma
Legal Disclaimers All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Trial Lawyers Arizona.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys
general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access
to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms
and Conditions.
Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep
Did You Know?